🔗 Share this article

Thhese days showcase a quite unusual situation: the first-ever US procession of the babysitters. They vary in their expertise and attributes, but they all have the same goal – to prevent an Israeli violation, or even destruction, of Gaza’s fragile truce. Since the hostilities ended, there have been rare days without at least one of the former president's representatives on the scene. Just recently saw the likes of a senior advisor, Steve Witkoff, a senator and a political figure – all coming to carry out their assignments.

Israel engages them fully. In only a few short period it executed a series of strikes in the region after the deaths of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) personnel – resulting, according to reports, in scores of local casualties. Several officials demanded a resumption of the conflict, and the Israeli parliament enacted a initial decision to take over the West Bank. The American response was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

However in more than one sense, the American government appears more intent on preserving the existing, unstable stage of the ceasefire than on progressing to the next: the reconstruction of Gaza. When it comes to that, it seems the United States may have ambitions but no tangible strategies.

Currently, it remains unknown at what point the proposed multinational administrative entity will truly take power, and the same is true for the proposed security force – or even the makeup of its members. On Tuesday, Vance said the US would not impose the composition of the international force on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's administration persists to dismiss various proposals – as it did with the Turkish proposal recently – what happens then? There is also the reverse question: who will decide whether the units preferred by Israel are even interested in the assignment?

The issue of how long it will need to neutralize Hamas is equally ambiguous. “The aim in the leadership is that the global peacekeeping unit is intends to now assume responsibility in demilitarizing the organization,” remarked the official lately. “That’s going to take some time.” The former president only emphasized the lack of clarity, declaring in an conversation recently that there is no “rigid” deadline for Hamas to demilitarize. So, in theory, the unnamed elements of this still unformed international force could deploy to the territory while Hamas fighters still remain in control. Would they be dealing with a leadership or a militant faction? These represent only some of the issues surfacing. Some might question what the result will be for everyday residents as things stand, with Hamas carrying on to target its own adversaries and critics.

Current events have afresh highlighted the blind spots of Israeli journalism on the two sides of the Gaza border. Each outlet seeks to analyze each potential aspect of the group's violations of the truce. And, in general, the situation that Hamas has been hindering the return of the remains of killed Israeli hostages has taken over the headlines.

By contrast, attention of civilian casualties in Gaza stemming from Israeli attacks has obtained scant attention – if any. Take the Israeli response actions following a recent southern Gaza occurrence, in which a pair of soldiers were lost. While local sources claimed dozens of casualties, Israeli news pundits questioned the “limited response,” which focused on solely installations.

That is typical. Over the previous weekend, Gaza’s media office accused Israel of infringing the truce with the group multiple occasions since the truce was implemented, causing the death of dozens of individuals and harming another many more. The allegation appeared unimportant to most Israeli reporting – it was just absent. Even information that 11 individuals of a local household were lost their lives by Israeli forces last Friday.

Gaza’s rescue organization reported the group had been attempting to return to their home in the Zeitoun area of the city when the vehicle they were in was fired upon for allegedly passing the “demarcation line” that marks zones under Israeli army control. That boundary is invisible to the ordinary view and shows up just on charts and in official papers – not always obtainable to average residents in the region.

Even that incident barely got a note in Israeli news outlets. One source covered it shortly on its online platform, citing an IDF official who explained that after a suspect car was detected, forces fired cautionary rounds towards it, “but the vehicle continued to advance on the soldiers in a fashion that posed an immediate danger to them. The forces engaged to neutralize the risk, in compliance with the truce.” No fatalities were stated.

Given this perspective, it is understandable many Israeli citizens feel Hamas solely is to at fault for violating the ceasefire. That view threatens prompting demands for a stronger strategy in the region.

At some point – perhaps sooner rather than later – it will no longer be sufficient for US envoys to take on the role of supervisors, telling the Israeli government what not to do. They will {have to|need